Quote:
Originally posted by AtlUmpSteve
I agree with Mike. According to 4-3.B, the FLEX is placed in the 10th position. The rule does NOT require the word "FLEX" be indicated on the lineup. Since a 10th player was listed, the FLEX was legally in the game, and by inference, the use of the DP is known (4-3.A) prior to the start of the game, and that player's name is indicated in one of the nine hitting positions.
Oh, which player is it? If all players but one have a listed defensive position, the one is the DP. If none have a listed position, that is a clerical error, correctable the same as discovering a wrong uniform number. You want a penalty, visitors? Sorry, none applicable, just a correction.
Plate umpire, learn the process and reasoning behind checking a lineup. The ONLY really necessary things to clarify is the DP, the FLEX, the pitcher and the catcher (to clarify who is initially eligible for a courtesy runner). At least get that part right; then, don't penalize a team incorrectly for not doing your job.
|
Totally agree with you and Mike. This was my point. Wish the PU of
the game had come back on Sunday so full details would have been
available. Since act took place on first batter, and she was not the
individual in question, I cannot see any violation. Did not see line
up sheet either, but like stated, ten listed, we as umpires now
know we have a FLEX/DP. Not sure if DP listed, but she would be a
legal batter even if leading off. Am trying to contact the PU of the
game, but no answer as of this time.
Thanks, Mike and Steve.