View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 09, 2001, 12:23pm
Brian Watson Brian Watson is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,051
Whether he saw the other player or not and the fact one is male and one is female is irrelevant. From the description it should be a player control foul .

As far as the ball being thrown, flagrant is in the eye of the beholder. I would say at minimum a T would be issued, but unless the ball was thrown at another playerÂ’s head or an official, realistically it would probably not be called flagrant.

By book definition, I suppose it should be flagrant, but there are times when the book is not reality. Throwing a ball is not a simple as throwing a punch.
Reply With Quote