View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 05:18pm
kbarnett kbarnett is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6
ok chief, so it was a backward pass... and as a backward pass, if not caught is a fumble, and as a backward pass still allows for the reciever, while still behind the LOS, to then attempt a forward pass, there seems to be distinct differences in the rules revolving around backward passes that don't apply to forward passes and visa versa. So, my question.... is the infraction of offensive pass interferance legitimate or even possible, on a play for which never contained a forward pass...
Reply With Quote