Thread: Key to Part 1
View Single Post
  #82 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 28, 2004, 11:03pm
JRutledge JRutledge is offline
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,533
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
No, I'm saying that there is a potential in this practise for having some officials somewhere in the country cheat on their exams. If someone hasn't written it yet, and they now have to pass the exam to be certified in their state, then having all of the answers sent to them well before they have to write the exam means that they can take the easy road, if they want to, and cheat. And how exactly then would you then know that no one else has't any ulterior/overt motives and wouldn't cheat? The potential is now there, isn't it?
Well that is not my problem. That is their problem. Not all states use the tests the same way. If a state wants to create a process, they need to be aware that in this day and age, officials can and will share information. If they want to protect the results, then change the process.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)