View Single Post
  #456 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 25, 2004, 09:21am
ChuckElias ChuckElias is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
BTW, how many WS have the Red Sox been in this century...
So the Sox haven't been in the Series in their last 20 years. The Yankees weren't in the Series in their first 20 years. So what?
The Red Sox are only 20 year old??
I just finished up Logic class for the day; you're going to have to do better than that. You talked about "this century". I grant you "this century" plus about 16 more years. Sox haven't even been in a World Series. But the Yankees weren't even [/i]in[/i] a World Series while the Sox were winning 5 of the first 15 of them, over a similar roughly-20-year period to open the previous century. Neither point is relevant to the bottom line, which is. . .

that the Sox are still playing this year, while the Yankees are not, which is enormously satisfying. Addtionally, the Yankees are not playing as a direct result of the Red Sox, which is even more satisfying. But not quite satistying enough. Nine down. . .
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote