Quote:
Originally posted by AirForceDude
Gentlemen
Wouldn't this also fall under the new change for 10-3-7d "Expanded rule pertaining to obstructing an opponentÂ’s vision to include the player with the ball"?
|
Yes, it could fall into that category. I mentioned that as the second and "less likely" scenario in my original post.
And. . .
Welcome to the Forum!
I seem to be typing that a lot the last few days.
