View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 20, 2004, 06:33am
mikesears mikesears is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 1,319
Quote:
Originally posted by sir_eldren
Ahh... That's correct. I don't know why I thought it would be encroachment. *shrug* But I did know it's a 5-yard penalty on the defense. ;o)

As for the theoretical situation: we would have an official's blunder. The referee should not have marked the ball ready for play. The defenseman should have been directed to the proper side of the neutral zone prior to chop, and if he refused then we could technically mark it ready and throw a flag for encroachment, although that would be a horrible thing to do and should never be done. LOL!

-Craig
It wouldn't be encroachment until the snapper put his hands on the ball. The only way this situation would be encroachment is if the B player were to touch the ball, an A player, or to give defensive signals.
Reply With Quote