Quote:
Originally posted by SoGARef
Jim,
Are you sure. Aren't you describing the all-but-one enforcement? If you are then R would have to be considered to be in possession of the ball. They muffed the ball and never gained possession.
Also, why if the ball was nearly at rest and it is obvious that the ball will not go into the EZ would the batting of the ball by R be a new force?
|
I really do not know what you mean by "the all-but-one enforcement." The enforcement is correct as described (and the all-but-one principle applies to almost all live-ball fouls).
Also, force is never a factor in kicks going in to R's endzone...they are always touchbacks.