View Single Post
  #53 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 16, 2004, 10:09am
Carl Childress Carl Childress is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Edinburg, TX
Posts: 1,212
Send a message via ICQ to Carl Childress
[QUOTE]Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by Carl Childress
Quote:

Once and for all: I have no opinion on the Hopkins ruling, and -- of course -- nobody has provided an OBR interpretation. That's the one that everybody is so vigorously defending -- and it doesn't exist! My play in the BRD (Play 26-22) ruled that in OBR the batter-runner was out. The nearest thing to an OBR interpretation you can find in print is -- mine!

Hearty, har, har.
The WUA site includes this: "The new interpretation goes on to emphasize that a ball stuck in a fielderÂ’s glove is not to be considered out of play; the ball remains live. It is legal for one fielder to throw the glove with a live ball stuck in it to another fielder. A fielder who possesses the ball/glove combination in his own hand or glove can complete a tag of a runner or base, just as if he were holding only the ball."
Bob: That's not an official interpretation. It's one umpire (Rick Roder) writing for the WCU. You can find the same "authoritative opiion" on page 32 of the latest J/R. But from PBUC or MLB -- nothing.
__________________
Papa C
My website
Reply With Quote