|
JJ:
It's irrelvant to me whether you're done. That easy to say when the issue is in dispute.
You wrote the following: "Am I missing something here? It sure looks like Carl agrees with me - that it's NOT interference and no base awards are made on the scenario outlined, and the batter's not out unless it's strike three."
I challenge you to quote any statement in context from any of my posts to support that assertion.
That disengenuous comment is what angered me, not that you disagreed. I'll debate the issues until a Democrat wins the White House. But my opponent must represent my position fairly. I'm sure the facts show you did not in this instance.
|