Fri Mar 16, 2001, 05:04pm
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Edinburg, TX
Posts: 1,212
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by JJ
Carl, my determination of "interference" on this play is backed up by NAPBL 4.11. Also by my book learnin' at Wendelstedt's school. It's only what, 6 or 7 to 2? I still like my chances. Find a hundred more on your side and we'll call it even!
|
I didn't realize we were voting on this. If no one's running and the batter hits the catcher with the follow-through, I've got nothing.
I guess that makes it seven to three.
|
Bob: I have just one word:
Amazing!
|