Quote:
Originally posted by JJ
Silly me. I thought the NAPBL was a set of common sense guidelines and clarifications on situations PRO umpires would run into. I guess they issue those books for fun and tell the umpires at some point to ignore them and go by the OBR without exception or question. I now know better.
I'll tell Harry you say hi.
|
I did tell him. He doesn't know who "JJ" is. You'll have to email me your full name.
The PBUC (there
is no current NAPBL manual) is exactly what you say it is. I trust it implicitly. None can recommend it more highly than I.
Now -- Explain to me how the material I quoted from your 4.11 citation differs from the language of the OBR. What exactly do we learn from 4.11 that contradicts OBR, which I quote explicitly in support of my position.