Quote:
Originally posted by His High Holiness
[/B]
|
This board is exactly the same. There are a few people who really know what they are doing and bunch a Little League and Babe Ruth style umpires who want to argue with them. At the camps, the Major League bigs dogs politely engage the jerk students. Likewise, here on the forum most of the big dogs politely engage the apprentices. A few, like me, tell them to shut up and listen.
The wannabes want to attend a two hour clinic and come to the forum and argue with me. They think that this will make them better and that they are now good umpires.
They suck, and they and their ilk are the only ones that don't know it. Real umpires know that they suck, and the coaches and players that suffer through their games know they suck. Most real umpires politely string them along in their delusion. That is the one thing that makes me different. In that regard, I am like the coaches and players who tell them that they suck.
[/B][/QUOTE]I agree with that completely!!!!
There's just no damn way that the "greenhorns and wannabes" and "bullsh*t umpires from the unruly bush leagues" should ever have the temerity to question any of the "officials of accomplishment" on this forum. That's just not right! They should know their place, damnit! They're not "Big Dogs, are they? Whatinthehell do they think this is anyway? A public forum or something? They should just "suck" quietly!
It is OK for you greenhorns, wannabes and bullsh*t umpires to pay to read the Master's articles though. Just make sure that you don't try to comment on them afterwards!!!!
Sigh! It's just not easy to be a Big Dog anymore!
Lah me!
