Quote:
Originally posted by Hawks Coach
JR
since we already use the cone for measures of hypothetical verticality, I think we need more a cube of correctability, which has not yet been defined. Therefore, you could define it to include correcting your previously and potentially eroneous calculations of foul counts. Of course, I am not an engineer, so I am not sure about the proper procedure for correcting calculations. Plus, I thought the horse was dead at least three times over before you noted the error, so it may not be within the quadrilateral boundary established by the vertical cube.
|
Coach, just a few points to clear some matters up:
1) We have also used the cone for measurements of hpothetical horizontality also.
2) I have already used the "cone of "correctibility" to delete the word "potentially" above, and accuratize the phrase used to "previously erroneous calculations of foul counts".
3) Just as an aside, and fyi, did you know that the same person who wrote "The Erroneous Zone" also wrote the "Kama Sutra"? Dr Ruth.
4) I are an engineer.
5) A horse is a horse, of course, of course!
6) A quadrilateral boundary encompasses four times as much area as a unilateral boundary, and is also highly recommended by the United Nations. Iow, it will cover up FOUR times as many vertical cubes.
7) You can pick your friends. You can also pick your nose. You can't wipe your friends on your shirt sleeve though. I think.