View Single Post
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 03, 2004, 03:00pm
cingram
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by rockyroad
I feel like I have a hangover, and I haven't had any brownpops in weeks!!! Good grief...

[/B]
Hey, I'm working on my MTD Sr.(patent pending) response.You just keep writing a whole buncha things down until everybody gets confused. Wait 'til I bring up the "cone of correctibility" next. [/B][/QUOTE]

I think where you may have become confused is with point #9 "I had instantly remembered that both B5 and B45 were in the area when my partner whistled B45 for his fourth and knew that it had been incorrectly recorded as B5. My partner tends to report rather quickly and table likely just missed him first showing 4 fingers." - This is referring to the 3rd Quarter when B45 should have received his 4th, but it may have accidentally been given to B5 (giving B5 his 4th instead of B45 his 4th).

I'm really not trying to confuse everybody (sorry if I did)

Basically a short summary - 9 fouls called on B5 and B45 together
The book has B5 - 5, B45 - 4
Refs know this is incorrect and changed it to be B5 - 4, B45 - 5 (as they believed it should be).

Hope this is better
Reply With Quote