|
Gospel According To Carl
[/QUOTE]
First, the difference between EWS and the rest of us is that we leave our opinions outside the gate when we step onto the field. I may feel that we should "get it right at all costs," but I won't compromise my philosophy with the illegality of changing a call. And who are we to argue what is legal and what is not? If Carl says that "such and such" is an official ruling, I'd bet money he's right. The man is a distinguished author of many articles and books related to umpiring, so why would he tarnish his reputation by stating something he knows to be false? Until any of us can boast a resume like Carl's, we better take what he says as gospel and move on... Dennis [/QUOTE]
Dennis,
I cannot speak for Carl but I would suspect that is the last thing he would want. Most know that by profession Carl spent many years as a teacher. I think he sees himself in that same light as an "umpire mentor". The last thing a good teacher wants is for you to accept what they say just because of their credentials. I think what Carl, Warren and others get upset about is when their theories, rulings, or opinions are dismissed outright or challenged merely because of who presented them. Carl's posts are the first ones I read on any Board and I would not oppose them without "doing my homework". Jim Simms/NYC
|