Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Well, it's best to warn the coach when you give the T to the assistant, so that he has the choice. He might not have done it if you had warned him. However, then when he gets mouthy, he gets a T. This still doesn't run him, though. because one direct plus one indirect isn't quite an eject. If he doesn't get the message after all this, you'll be delighted to run him when the time comes. So will a lot of other folks in the gym.
|
Jewel,
I am confused by your statement.
If a head coach does not know that I just T'd his assistant, then what, I wonder, is the coach doing? ...Where has he gone? How could he
not know?
I wonder, if for some reason he left the gym and I T'd his assistant, did I actually T the replacement head coach, ... or the assistant? If I T'd the replacement and the head coach returns, do I note the indirect on the returnee?
How does that work?
mick