Pray tell, what type of conflict can exist? Afterall, the director directs the teams in the league and has no interest as to the outcome of games played on the field. As an umpire he is, again, impartial in all aspects as to the outcome of the game. Where is there even a PERCEIVED conflict in any of these duties?
I say it is hard enough to get good people to serve on boards and commissions let alone recruit a good ump. Let the naysayers say what they want and explain to them that they would be welcome to take over the director job or enlist as an ump. Gimme a break...
__________________
"We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."
Chris Z.
Detroit/SE Michigan
|