View Single Post
  #87 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 16, 2004, 09:39pm
Dan_ref Dan_ref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Re: partly answered my own question

Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
After doing some research in the officials manual, if found the following:
223 on page 32 and in 335 on page 63
Reminders: ... Use the proper signal to indicate running the end line privileges are in effect when the clock has been stopped.

Checking the signal chart on page 91, one sees that signal number 18 is the proper one to use.

So, I will now give this signal in these situations, but I still will not verbally announce anything or tell the player that he may run with my voice, unless he specifically asks me. It is only the verbal to which I object.

To answer those who have said that announcing the running priviledge helps both the offense and the defense, I would say that the defense doesn't derive any benefit from this because: if the offensive player runs the defense simply follows him; if it was permitted, no problem; if it wasn't then play is stopped for the violation.
Have you ever seen a defender stand still based on the rationale that he didn't think the offensive player could run on that throw-in? If he does stand it is more likely that he thought the offense could never move on any throw-in. Either way it is poor coaching, not poor officiating.

[Edited by Nevadaref on Apr 16th, 2004 at 09:35 PM]
I'm not motivated enough to go back & check but I don't recall anyone saying to "announce" anything. Having said that, I personally make it a habit to tell the player throwing in whether or not he can run the line and the defender to not violate the line before each throw-in I administer. And I never expect a reply from either BTW.

FWIW.
Reply With Quote