Quote:
Originally posted by Billy
And I'm all for having fun! You can call me rook and make fun of "Billy" as a screen name and I'll call you "ACC FANBOY". Cool. But hey, when did Rut ever stick to the facts? No, your more like Rut than me and I thought to say it first. Nahnah! ;-)
|
Billy, I can site just as many "facts" as you can. But what an individual draws from those "facts" can be very one sided.
For example, in an earlier post, you wrote, "I guess the big east is the best confrence (3 for 6)." Well big whoop! I can counter that with that the ACC is 2 for 4.
You wrote, "Each team had three in the sweet sixteen, but at that level the ACC didn't win a game over a big east oppenent." That's true, can't argue that. But there were no BE/ACC matchups in the Sweet 16! Could that be why the ACC didn't beat a BE team "at that level?" DUH!
A #2 beating a #1 or a #5 beating a #4 is not that big of a deal. It happens quite often. Seeding is a guessing game to begin with.
Yeah, UConn beat Duke and GT in the Final Four. They should have, as they were the best team. But who did UConn's two non-conference losses come from? North Carolina and Georgia Tech. Those are facts too.
So yeah, we can quote facts all day. In the end, it don't mean a thang.