Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by Billy
Couldn't care less about UConn football...I thought we
were talking hoop? Are you sure you aren't Ruts evil twin? When you have nothing to come back with you changed the subject and started in calling me names. That all ya got ACC "FANBOY"? "Old timer". Now, isn't that silly? Calling people names when you have nothing better.
|
Dude, it'a all in fun. Stop being so serious about it all. You can call me Old Timer anytime you want to, and I'll call you Li'l Bill, since you don't like rook. 
Quote:
|
Do you really think UConn / Big East folks are the ones that are "peeved" right now? PSYCH 101 projection old chum.
|
Unless I'm mistaken, I beleive the lawsuit was filed in Connecticut. UConn is a major player in the suit. So yes, I'd say the BE and UConn are still quite peeved, although I'm sure they enjoyed beating two ACC teams in the Final 4. They were better than both.
BTW, you sound a lot more like Rut than I do. 
|
Sorry, I'm no lawyer. I don't care how they divy it up. Just
win baby! Which goes to answering HawksCoach: the BE was seeded lower than ACC teams and beat higher seeds. The ACC was seeded higher and tended to lose over the last two years. That would make the ACC overated and the BE underrated. I think UConn is something like 19-0 against lower seeds. Duke has lost to lower seeded UConn twice.
And I'm all for having fun! You can call me rook and make fun of "Billy" as a screen name and I'll call you "ACC FANBOY". Cool. But hey, when did Rut ever stick to the facts? No, your more like Rut than me and I thought to say it first. Nahnah! ;-)