View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 29, 2004, 11:13am
ShadowStripes ShadowStripes is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 116
This is a situation where having to review replay hurt the officials. Clearly a foul was called just before the expiration of time. However, without the benefit of replay, 99% of officials would have declared that the horn sounded and OT would be played. But, since a whistle was blown, officials have the obligation to see if it occurred before time expired. I'm guessing the calling official regrets blowing the whistle on that one. There was contact, but bailing out a team that missed a lay-up by calling a foul on a loose ball rebound scramble with under one second to go in a tie game is not an ideal way to decide the game. Even Pat Summitt seemed dissatisifed with the way the game ended.
Reply With Quote