Thread: Big school bias
View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 29, 2004, 01:03am
JRutledge JRutledge is offline
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
Quote:
Originally posted by mightyvol
in all honesty guys come on. who are you trying to kid. the right call should have been a no call. rich you are out of your mind if that wasnt over the back. as far as it not being called i can live with that, what i cant live with is the fact that a great game was determined on a very very questionable call. the fact of the matter is that they blew the whistle and life goes on, but dont tell me that the over the back wasnt more obvious than the loose ball foul. come on rich.

mighty
What the hell is "over the back?" You either have a push or a block, but "over the back" is not a call. Two players jumping for the ball is not a foul if one player is taller. I admit I did not see the entire game, but I did see the highlight and what I saw I would not call a foul for the play you wanted. I could see the play that was called a foul. But that is best determined by what was called the entire game. If that was called earlier, it has to be called at the end.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote