View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 03, 2004, 09:23am
Dakota Dakota is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
I agree with the safety improvement, but for me that is not the biggest reason I favor removing the "about to receive" phrase. My reason is consistency among the umpires.

I found it very frustrating to be partnered with umpires who defined for themselves what ASA meant by that - that they ruled it to mean "ball in flight" and even "set up ready for a throw yet to be made."

Yes, allowing defensive players to block the basepath in anticipation of a throw (or even to just block the path) is a safety issue. After all, softball ain't hockey. There is no "goalie" position. But for me it was more of a consistency of calls issue. (A selfish outlook, I know.)

__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote