View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 17, 2004, 11:45pm
RookieDude RookieDude is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,856
Quote:
Originally posted by thumpferee
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
If you thought B1 aimed for the throat, I'd call that flagrant. If he had his hand out, and A1 kind of moved in, and B1 was just there, so to speak, then I think you can get away with the intentional. In fact, it seems to me that's what the intentional call is for -- rough play with excessive contact, that isn't fighting. Probably a good call.
For you too Z!

A1 retaliates by punching B1 in the mouth. What ya got now?

4.18.2
Ya got both players disqualified for fighting.

But, if B1 had taunted and A1 did not retaliate with a punch...then you might just have a T on B1.
Just like missinglink had just an intentional on B1, with no retaliation by A1.
Could be either like Z said.



__________________
Dan Ivey
Tri-City Sports Officials Asso. (TCSOA)
Member since 1989
Richland, WA
Reply With Quote