Quote:
Originally posted by icallfouls
2-11-11- Note 2 Last sentence.
No time has run off the clock. The player should have been dq'd prior to attempting the 1st FT. Since player A was incorrectly awarded an unmerited FT, and it was discovered prior to the next live ball for the 2nd FT, it must be disallowed. That being the case, it is a correctable error and the substitute throws by player A's substitute are to be given.
I think that some of us are treating this as if time has run since the foul, which is a different ruling altogether and would not be correctable.
Great discussion!
|
Actually some of us are treating this as if A1 is NOT dq'ed until we are told by the table A1 has 5 fouls and we then tell coach A that A1 has 5 fouls. At that point A1 is dq'ed. Prior to that point A1 has the right to play, since he's a playa.
This has nothing to do with 2-10.