From my reading of the initial post, it appears they did not get the fouls right and may not have got the penalties right. First we have potentially a flagrant foul on A1. Then we have the incident with B1 and A1 retaliating? It seems that we have personal (flagrant?inetntional?common?) on A1, then the fighting situation that involved both players. Seems to me that B should be shooting two for the initial foul, regardless of type, then you go to possession arrow on the double flagrant Ts. If you do not have the T on A1, then both teams would shoot and I guess you must have called a flagrant foul on A1.
The way the post read, we had two Ts and no common/intentional/flagrant foul on A1.
|