View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 02, 2001, 11:46pm
BktBallRef BktBallRef is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by Brian Watson
No matter what type of foul you call (flagrant personal or flagrant technical) you/need to call offsetting fouls in this situation. B had to commit some type of foul to warrant an ejection.

Technically, I think you would have had a flagrant personal on A, and a T on B. Either way, since it was a double foul, you go to the arrow no matter what type of double it is.

You guys did the right thing in coming to a conclusion. The best thing to do is come together and determine what is going to happen before you go to the bench and report anything.
Mark is correct. If you have a flagrant personal foul, and then a flagrant technical foul, you have a false double foul. Substitute for B1 shoots his two FTs, then Team A shoots the technical foul FTs, and then A gets the ball at the division line.

bainemc, that's probably how it should have been handled.

In NC, A1 would be disqualified. B1 would be ejected, if the elbow was considered fighting, and would be suspended for two games. We have to know if we have an ejection or a disqualification.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote