|
If and only if the official poses a significant hazard to the safety of the players or commits some sort of crime during the game should game administration EVER have the authority to stop the game, regardless of whether the official was right or wrong in his actions. The officials are the sole authority in charge of the game, and had the situation between the crowd and the official grown so out of control that it impacted the conduct of the game (which it must have for GA to determine that ejection was its only recourse), then the gym should have been cleared of all spectators by GA and finished in an empty gym. The official is needed to continue the game and the crowd isn't, so eliminating the crowd would have been the best solution (particularly when it was the crowd and not the players who the official was feuding with). There is absolutely NO justification in this context for throwing the official out of the gym, I don't care if he got on the PA and swore at the crowd.
Of course every official is accountable for his actions after the game and ANY official who engages in gross misconduct will be reprimanded by their association. It reflects badly on all officials whenever someone behaves as is alleged by the school, but the proper course of action is to report the actions to a higher authority. This is especially true since there are no indications that the game was in any sort of jeopardy. The school should be strongly reprimanded for such action, to the point where the association should ding the school if it has the option or the power to do so.
|