Quote:
Originally posted by BTTB
Finally, if this is all in my head, and I'm participating in a psychotic mass movement that lacks all merit, and if the PAC officials are as good as there are anywhere, then there is something else I'm gonna have to figure out. Why do so many PAC 10 coaches elect to allow their intersectional opponents to provide the game officials, home and away, and not use PAC 10 officials when they travel, as they have the option to do? That it should be a better option to use your opponent's officials EVERY TIME you play them, than to EVER involve your own conference officials in the contest is counterintuitive to me, at least if there are no quality issues. Any ideas?
|
Hey Genius. Every conference does that to a certain extent. For one, most officials that work in any major conference, work in other major conferences. Just about every "big time" official works at the very least 3 Major conferences. Just goes to show how little you really know about officiating. Because someone that works in the PAC-10, probably works in the WAC or Mountain West, just to name a few. It is not unusual to see Ted Higgins work the Big 12 on Monday, the ACC on Tuesday and then Conference USA on Wednesday. And if I am not mistaken, just this week he was on ESPN the last 3 days with a similar schedule.
Just shows how little you actually know. Because the "non-conference" games are not given to push over officials. At least not when big time conferences like the Pac-10 and the Big Ten play each other.
You have a lot to learn.
Peace