Garth,
I am sorry, but I do not agree with you on what you said about me. I honestly do not feel I am going over board at all with my response. I am responding with valid, honest information, admitting my mistakes that I have made.
People have asked for sources that I base the information I have, I give to them. So, I do not agree with you that I ingore requests from people wanting my sources of information that I use or have used in the past.
However, most of the time(notice I said most of the time) you, and Rich come out with what appears to be a "high and mighty" attitude.
Honestly, I do not feel that I come across that way. I feel that I come with a very good attitude, good approach, honesty and interegity. Plus, if I am wrong, I come back and admit that I was wrong and we go on from there.
But in my opinion, you and Rich continue to drag it on and on longer then it needs to be dragged on. It was simple misreading, and then misinformation on my part that got this whole thing going. I admitted I was wrong and we let it go and move on.
I came on to give a newer baseball umpire a response to his original post. Then, for what ever reason(that I still do not understand), you and Rich start teeing off on me over history since I registered with this site.
How does the actions by you and Rich have any thing to do with officiating?
[Edited by johnSandlin on Oct 23rd, 2003 at 11:41 AM]
|