Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
Only if you think it's somehow "unsporting" -- and this example doesn't fit with any of the other examples of "unsporting" in the rules book.
|
Under Section 19 article 5 (technical foul) there is no mention of "unsporting".
Unsporting fouls are defined under article 14:
"ART. 14 . . . An unsporting foul is a noncontact technical foul which
consists of unfair, unethical, dishonorable conduct or any behavior not in
accordance with the spirit of fair play"
Do you not consider being in an illegal position to be "behavior not in accordance with fair play" or "unfair conduct"?
Other actions considered to be unfair have written penalties and we adjudicate accordingly. Again, I would ask, is this an instance of illegal play that is not penalized? So far, some are suggesting yes. If so, an occurrence of that is very rare...as in perhaps argued by some as being the
only instance of this in the rule book. (the requirement of the scorer wearing stripes might be argued as anther instance but that is a different thread)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond
A screen is only a screen when there's contact. Otherwise it's just somebody standing on the court somewhere.
If a defender is in an illegal guarding position and the offensive player goes around them, are you using that same philosophy to call a foul?
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
|
I like your logic Raymond, and I officiate it the way everyone has described so far. I still feel your case is not quite the same situation. In your case, a player' illegal position does not penalize the opponent. In the case I described, the player's position
does penalize the opponent.
I am merely trying to determine if this is a case of an illegal activity that has no documented penalty. It appears to be the case. A player can break a rule and not be penalized within the rule book.