Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond
A1 went airborne to shoot. Whether or not they released the try is irrelevant. Shooting fouls without the release of the ball happen all the time.
A1is still airborne when the illegal contact occurs. Players are capable of releasing tries during their descent. Players are capable of releasing tries after having the ball initially capped by a defender.
If A1 wasn't capable of still releasing the try, then that contact to the forearm should have been ruled incidental.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
|
You are hung up on the notion that A1 jumped to shoot. In this particular case that doesn’t matter. Since the ball was never released, A1 being airborne at the time of the foul is irrelevant. All that matters is whether the official deemed that he was still in the act of shooting at the time of the foul. The official clearly decided that the try had ended, so no FTs are warranted.
It is true that a foul in the act of shooting could prevent the ball from being released, but that foul would have to take place prior to the try ending.