Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond
My post wasn't cryptic. You asked a question and I posed a questioned in return that should have led to you making a determination which rule applies to the situation posed in the initial post.
|
I actually enjoyed and was challenged by your "questioning" post. And I wasn't upset that you didn't just simply give an answer.
My answer was that officials often try to avoid having six players on the court, and except in rare cases where players "dash" off the bench, if six players are discovered during a live ball on the court immediately after a timeout, intermission, or substitution, officials often have themselves to blame by rushing the administration of inbounds play.
Was that the answer that you expected from me, because you never replied to confirm or deny?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
... how does one decide between a 10-5-2 Bench Technical or 10-2-2 Team Technical?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond
Hasn't the content and context of several responses already answered your question?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond
Put the 2 rules side-by-side. Then think back over your 40 years of officiating about which rule is something we as officials always try to prevent from being violated b/c we tend to blame ourselves when it happens.
|
If you accepted my answer, it implies that you support a 10-2-2 Team Technical penalty.
If you rejected my answer, that implies that you support a 10-5-2 Bench Technical penalty.
I already know that your don't support ilyazhito's 10-3 Substitute Technical penalty, and neither do I.