Case 3.2.2B and 3.2.2C seem on-point. If #12/10 becomes a player (as he did by being beckoned) and the error is discovered, it's a T. If the individual does not become a player, then it's not a T. IOW, we don't care what numbers bench personnel wear, as long as they are not duplicates.
Note that some would say that the second part of case 3.2.2C is "wrong" -- once the individual becomes a player, it will be a T, even if the error is discovered while that individual has been removed from the game and is no longer playing. But, until NFHS changes it ....
|