Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach Bill
I said it looks like it was called a "false" double foul, I.e., two separate acts. So, I think we're in agreement with how they administered it. Except, I can't figure out why the ball was inbounded at the division line. And, since neither was flagrant, I can't figure out why they didn't go to POI.
|
A false double foul is when one of the fouls is live and the next foul is dead. That did not happen here. It is just two different Ts, that is it.
Also, dead ball contact fouls used to be opposite the table and at the division line. I think the officials just got a little confused there. That again is the only reason I can make out for where the throw-in took place.
Peace