Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
4.41.4 SITUATION B: A1’s three-point try is short and below ring level when it hits the shoulder of: (a) A2; or (b) B1 and rebounds to the backboard and through the basket. RULING: The three-point try ended when it was obviously short and below the ring. However, since a live ball went through the basket, two points are scored in both (a) and (b). (5-1)
|
Nice citation.
"
Short and below the ring" implies (can't be certain) that it hits a shoulder inside the three point arc.
What if the shoulder was simply below the ring but outside the three point arc?
Is the most important part of the interpretation that the "try ended"?
If so, hasn't the NFHS already decided that it doesn't have to be a try for it to be three points?
Is there a similar interpretation about a pass that "ended"?
Does the NFHS only limit three points to passes, trys, and deflected (blocked) trys, and not to deflections off of other body parts, or bounces off the floor?
Wouldn't it be nice if they stated that somewhere?
Aren't many deflections (blocks) below ring level?
Don't "deflectors (blockers)" often have inside the three point arc status.
Can a try be "deflected (blocked)" with a body part other than hand? Wrist? Forearm? Elbow? Upper arm? Shoulder? Head?
What's the most important part (purpose and intent) of Camron Rust's interpretation?
Lots of questions from me, with no definite answers for some questions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
I can certainly understand why the officials in the original post were confused. We have debated NFHS situations here on the Forum for similar situations, for example, deflected "passes", and deflected "shots", off of either offensive or defensive players, some being deflected off of body parts that are not hands, including "shots" or "passes" that were originally going "sideways" (east-west), all these being complex, and sometimes confusing, situations.
|
I sometimes wish that the NFHS continued to limit three points to trys, as they did in ancient times.