Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
Agree.
But in this situation the loss of player control was not "because of a touch by an opponent", as required by rule.
In this situation the loss of player control during the interrupted dribble was because of the ball handler's own ineptitude (maybe the dribbled ball hit off his foot).
The "another player" part of the rule isn't relevant because there was no pass, nor was there a fumble, in this situation.
|
I have deleted 2 responses. I agree with the OP ruling 99%, especially after research and reading NFHS case 4.15.4 Sit D and Sit E. I will get over that 1% hump soon enough.