View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 31, 2020, 10:43am
Bad Zebra Bad Zebra is offline
Official & Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Official View Post
Change it up a little...

If B2 had possessed the ball while airborne from the FC and landed in the BC, it would be a BC violation. Since the jump ball ended when the ball touched the floor, 9-9-3 is no longer applicable.
Interesting twist. I wonder how many officials would wrap their heads around the:
1) jump ball ending
2) player control attained in FC and
3) landing in BC, causing the violation

That’s a lot to process in a split second.
__________________
Calling it both ways...since 1999
Reply With Quote