Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
This part sounds nice and neat, but I’ve never seen such stated in anything from the NFHS. One could probably draw this conclusion from the structure of the penalty section, but it would great to see something formal.
I don’t agree with this. Doesn’t meet the definition.
|
Agree with your point on item 3. Since the fouls were not against each other, it can't be a double. It could be considered simultaneous, however. That would have the same net effect (offset/POI).
For me, it would depend on the time between the two events. If close (within a second or so) I'm calling them simultaneous. If not that close, I'm calling them two independent infractions and FTs would be shot for each, in the order of occurrence.
As for something from the NFHS regarding what offsets...see
Rule 10 Penalty Summary No. 8. Fighting:
Someone has cited this section here:
https://bsbproduction.s3.amazonaws.c...fight-rule.pdf
They clearly separate the penalties for players involved and non-players involved.