Quote:
Originally Posted by tjones1
Agree - thought it should of been an F1.
They said they called it a T which is why anyone was allowed to shoot the free throws.
I don't agree with the ruling.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Official
I couldn’t watch the game and haven’t seen the play, but if they ruled it a technical for touching the ball, it’s a Class B which is only one FT.
|
They reviewed it and said that it was an F1. However, they then either forgot that the inbounder has to attempt the FTs or had the wrong player as the thrower.
Note: this would be the second time in the tourney that a wrong FT shooter gets Higgins. He was the alternate a couple of years ago when the crew put the wrong shooter at the line. They all failed to advance.