View Single Post
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 24, 2019, 06:23pm
BigCat BigCat is offline
Official Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,795
Originally Posted by BillyMac View Post
Nice citation BayStateRef, thanks, especially if the answer is indeed not just an IAABO "interpretation" but a NFHS consultation.

While the interpretation may be deemed wrong by some highly respected and esteemed Forum members, it's still a valid IAABO/NFHS interruption, and until changed may be the only interpretation we can hang our hats on.

While I now feel better about my opinion, I would still like to see some of the original intent language back from ancient times when the rule was changed.

How about Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. to the rescue?

Itís not an interpretation. Itís two separate case plays. Youíve put them both up in previous posts. They have to be read together..
Reply With Quote