Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
My theory:
The rules book legitimately has "double" and "false-double" fouls. And, it legitimately has "false-multiple" fouls. But, you can't have a "false something" without also having that "something." So, the definition and penalty was added just for completeness.
|
Well, you really wouldn't need to even define false-multiple if there were no multiple. The "false-multiples" would just be fouls.