Fri Sep 12, 2003, 02:38pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by mick
Quote:
Originally posted by Camron Rust
If contact during a dead ball is not flagrant or intentional, it should be ignored. If it is flagrant or intentional, it becomes a technical foul.
If he called a personal, it was incorrect since it was during a dead ball. If he called a technical, it was incorrect because it was neither flagrant nor intentional.
|
Double foul or technical?
We judge the time lapse between the two acts:
very short time (pure judgement) ---> Double foul
a little longer than a very short time (pure judgement) ---> Technical foul
Either way the offensive player should be punished if the contact was, in fact, sufficient.
mick
|
It sounds to me like the second foul was in retaliation for the first foul. Does that figure into your judgement at all?
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
|