View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 20, 2018, 02:58pm
EricH EricH is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by RKBUmp View Post
Running the bases is not an act of interference. Other than a batter runner between home and first, there is no penalty for a runner hit by a thrown ball unless they commit some act of interference.
You could say the same about a fielder standing in the path of a base runner. He has not committed an ACT of obstruction, but he will be called for it anyway. So give me a better reason. Both definitions (of obstruction and interference) reference an "act." So we cannot hold the fielder to a higher standard than the runner.
Reply With Quote