Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
No, the other cases mention that another touch happens and a violation has occurred but they do not say that the violation can't occur without it.
|
Can't believe I am doing this...sigh. You are incorrect. The word "provided" in the case I cited indicates that the violation can't occur without the second touch.
Even 4.15.4 Sit D indicates the second touch is required with the words "..because the ball was touched twice..."