View Single Post
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 25, 2018, 02:12pm
SC Official SC Official is offline
Official Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,281
Originally Posted by BillyMac View Post
I would allow one (the former) but I wouldn't allow the other (the later). The question on the floor is what rulebook, casebook, or annual interpretation, citation can we use to support our opinion?
None, at least for the former which you and I would allow. At least, I would allow it until the game got delayed to wipe up water (can't give an official DOG warning if it's not after a TO).

Ironically, Nevadaref normally is 100% by the book with no room for interpretation, and now on this issue he's the one making s*it up that doesn't have any rules support.
Reply With Quote