Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond
1) First you say it's not a travel, then you say it's splitting hairs. It is a travel. Whether or not it is consistently called is another debate.
2) Close enough to the release of the shot, and significant enough contact to call a foul in this situation.
3) Significant enough contact to call a foul (on #4), especially in consideration of the previous play.
You still have the annoying habit of bashing officials instead of analyzing and breaking down plays. If you're going to call it "weak sh!t" here, then say it to them when they are observing at your camps. But don't be "that guy" who mouths off anonymously on social media, but not publicly with your name attached.
|
Whoa whoa whoa, nowhere did I bash any of the officials on the game. You
think I did, because I disagreed with the calls. However disagreeing with a call and thinking it is weak/not consistent with other calls made across the game/league/D1 is
not the same as bashing an official. All three guys on this game are excellent officials and while I may not like a call here, I have tremendous respect for their resumes and how hard they work. Full stop.
