View Single Post
  #44 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 22, 2018, 10:24pm
bucky bucky is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac View Post
Maybe by interpretation, but not by rule. The rule only states that players can't remove the jersey and/or pants/skirt within the visual confines of the playing area.
I disagree with it being considered an unsporting act. This is the part again, where in my opinion it involves skin.

Example: A1 is wearing a long-sleeve undershirt beneath his jersey. The jersey gets blood on it. A1, at the end of his bench, removes the jersey. IMO: I do not see that as being an unsporting act.

Now, same scenario, but A1 is not wearing an undershirt. I would err on the side of that being unsporting, since there is an exposed torso.

Example 2: A1 is wearing a long-sleeve undershirt beneath his jersey. A1 receives his 5th foul. Upon getting to the bench, A1 removes his jersey in disgust. IMO: I see that as being an unsporting act.

I feel, again just my opinion, that the intent of the NFHS was two-fold. One, it was to prevent exposed torsos (skin) and two, it was to penalize players removing jerseys in disgust.

I will try and follow the rules on it but if I encounter a player removing a jersey (not in disgust) with an undershirt, I would be hard-pressed to call a T.
__________________
If some rules are never enforced, then why do they exist?
Reply With Quote