Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
No. It is not a false multiple. It was not committed against the same opponent. It is just two fouls....perhaps simultaneous fouls (approximately the same time but not involving any of the same players).
|
I wish they included "Consecutive Fouls" in 4-19.
Not sure that would fit the definition of a Simultaneous Foul because that would mean fouls by both teams.
My underlying question is this: Would there ever be a circumstance where we would NOT administer the penalties for consecutive fouls in the order that they occurred? If the first foul of a false multiple foul was intentional and the second was a common foul, would we still penalize in that order? The crux of the situation is that the throw-in as a result of the intentional foul would then be ignored, and some don't agree with that.